? New Release: Wetlands Project-Hypothesis 7 - Macquarie Groundcover Vegetation on SEED Open Data Portal

Type: 
Datasets
Topic: 
Announcement

About

We’re excited to announce the release of the Wetlands Project-Hypothesis 7 - Macquarie Groundcover Vegetation dataset on the SEED Open Data Portal!This dataset focuses on the Macquarie Marshes wetlands, located in central northern New South Wales, Australia, approximately 100 km…

We’re excited to announce the release of the Wetlands Project-Hypothesis 7 - Macquarie Groundcover Vegetation dataset on the SEED Open Data Portal!

This dataset focuses on the Macquarie Marshes wetlands, located in central northern New South Wales, Australia, approximately 100 km northeast of Warren and 180 km northwest of Dubbo. The Macquarie Marshes are one of the largest remaining inland semi-permanent wetlands in southeastern Australia and are of international importance. The study area includes the Macquarie watercourses and was part of the Integrated Monitoring of Environmental Flows Project (IMEF), a NSW-wide scientific program established in 1998.

? What’s in the Dataset? 
The dataset includes vegetation survey data from three main monitoring periods: 2000 (lead by Renee Kidson), 2001-2006 (lead by Chris Knight), and 2008-2010 (lead by Patrick Driver). It documents the distribution, percentage cover, and abundance of vegetation species along permanent 100m transects using a 5m x 5m quadrat at 10m intervals. The data also includes information on taxonomy, exotic/native status, and functional groups based on habitat and life history descriptions.

This dataset builds upon previous datasets for the Namoi, Lachlan, Murrumbidgee, and Gwydir catchments, as part of the broader Wetlands Project-Hypothesis 7 initiative.

? Why It Matters
The release of this dataset will assist in understanding the relationship between wetland water regimes and the biodiversity of plant species within the Macquarie Marshes. This information is valuable for water management, ecological research, and environmental conservation efforts, particularly in the context of wetland restoration.

? We invite you to contribute to this forum!
We’d love to hear your thoughts on how these resources could support your work or research. Click 'Reply' below to share your feedback, comments, and questions, and help shape better water management strategies for NSW by engaging with this SEED forum and dataset.

J

James P

Keywords

No information provided

Comments

No comments yet.

Overview

The study area is the Macquarie Marshes wetlands (including the Macquarie watercourses) located approximately 180 kms north-west of Dubbo in northwest NSW. This was a study as part of the Integrated Monitoring of Environmental Flows Project (IMEF). IMEF was a NSW wide scientific program established in 1998. IMEF provided ecological monitoring in relation to environmental flow rules. This in turn improved our knowledge of biodiversity and ecosystem processes in rivers and wetlands. The aim of this project was to establish relationships between wetland water regimes (flooding and drying c...
The study area is the Macquarie Marshes wetlands (including the Macquarie watercourses) located approximately 180 kms north-west of Dubbo in northwest NSW. This was a study as part of the Integrated Monitoring of Environmental Flows Project (IMEF). IMEF was a NSW wide scientific program established in 1998. IMEF provided ecological monitoring in relation to environmental flow rules. This in turn improved our knowledge of biodiversity and ecosystem processes in rivers and wetlands. The aim of this project was to establish relationships between wetland water regimes (flooding and drying cycles) and the diversity and abundance of wetland plants. The survey documents the distribution and percentage cover, and abundance (no. individuals per quadrat) of vegetation species and non-plant cover along permanent 100 m transects using a 5 m x 5 m quadrat at 10 m intervals in the Macquarie Marshes. Transects were marked using permanent posts and a 100m tape measure was used to position quadrats at 10 m intervals along the transect. The taxonomy (including genus and species) and exotic/native status, and functional groups (based on habitat and life history descriptions) has been checked against Plants of Western NSW (Cunningham et al. (1981)). Over the course of the monitoring the team members undertaking the vegetation surveys varied largely. Broadly, there were three main monitoring periods, however: 2000 (Renee Kidson as lead). 2001-2006 (Chris Knight as lead) and 2008-2010 (Patrick Driver as lead). Transects possibly moved slightly between the survey periods, mostly because of some lost site information but notably at Terrigal between the Kidson and Knight phases where the transect was moved 90 degrees to the original direction, ostensibly to be perpendicular with the channel as per the original method intent which was “At each site, a single fixed transect was placed perpendicularly to the stream or channel. Each transect is 100 m long and sampled at 10 m intervals. At each 10 m interval, a 5 m x 5 m quadrat is centred. This was some distance away at some floodplain and RRG sites. This is one variation within the methods described at: There were many blanks in Chris Knight’s field sheets which he advised meant zero, not no data, so analysis needs to know that might be an issue. I (PD) think we got this sorted correctly. Dr Bruce Chessman lead the development of the field methods via a broad set of criteria were communicated at the state level. However, each valley lead developed their own set of methods that they saw suitable to the landscape and resources. For the Macquarie this was originally Renee Kidson (see Kidson et al 2012 analyses on year 2000 data). A balanced representation of site types was usually sought, and also some iconic sites. For example, the private Ramsar site Wilgara was later included by Patrick Driver. All sites required landholder approval and reasonable wet weather access. Note: Data has complex issues that the data custodian can advise on. It would be advised and advantageous to collaborate with the custodian ([email protected] in the analysis of this data. ----------------------------------- Note: If you would like to ask a question, make any suggestions, or tell us how you are using this dataset, please visit the [NSW Water Hub which has an online forum](https://water-hub.seed.nsw.gov.au/thread/search) you can join.

Dataset Resources

Download

Data Quality Statement

Data quality statement for Wetlands Project-Hypothesis 7-Gwydir

Metadata Statement - Questionnaire_HYP7-Macquarie Groundcover Vegetation.pdf

Associated Metadata relevant to HYP7-Macquarie Groundcover Vegetation.pdf

1-Kidson et al 2012.PDF

A compilation of field and statistical studies on wetland replenishment responses, vegetation composition, and seasonal influences in the Macquarie Marshes during the extremely wet year of 2000, finalised by Patrick Driver.

2. 2000 IMEF plant data.xls

Associated data file from the above Kidson et al. (2012) report, containing vegetation data collected during 2000.

3. Macquarie Operations Manual.pdf

Chessman et al. (2003). IMEF Scientific and Technical Operating Procedures for the Macquarie Valley. This manual provides the monitoring framework, policy context, and methodology for environmental flow monitoring in the Macquarie Valley.

4. Chessman 2003 _imm00a.pdf

Overview of all IMEF monitoring methods, rationale, and key procedures, forming the backbone for standardised monitoring protocols.

5. Method 18a Wetland vegetation survey - Large wetlands.pdf

Chessman et al. (2007). A key IMEF method for monitoring large wetland vegetation communities across the Gwydir and Macquarie Marshes. Originally included as Appendix 4 in the Gwydir Environmental Contingency Allowance Annual Release Program 2007–2008 documentation.

6. 2003_Baker marshes wildlife alloc 2003.PDF

Assesses vegetation response and inundation extent across twelve IMEF sites following the 2002 Wildlife Allocation release, highlighting the interplay between artificial water releases and rainfall impacts on vegetation condition.

7. 2004 Love _Macquarie O&P 2002-03.pdf

Details system inflows, ecological conditions, and monitoring findings for the Macquarie Marshes during a dry year. Evaluates the short-term ecological responses to active water releases (Wildlife Allocation releases) and local rainfall events.

8. Chessman et al 2003 imef for 1998-2000 as on web.pdf

A state-level report evaluating early environmental flow outcomes. Findings showed limited ascribable environmental benefits, with some evidence of support for bird breeding events, though hydrological and ecological modelling capabilities were still under development.

9. 2007_05 marshes eflow report.pdf

This report by Driver & Knight (2007) documents the 2005–06 environmental flow event (~84,000 ML) in the Macquarie Marshes and its impact on groundcover plants, highlighting varied site responses influenced by dry conditions and transmission losses.

10. 2008_DWE report to EFRG May.pdf

The 2007–08 IMEF report describes on-ground environmental flow responses, with notable vegetation response in Buckiinguy Lagoon and Monkeygar Swamp, and limited response in parts of the Northern Nature Reserve.

11. monitor_2009_macquarievalley_report.pdf

This report evaluates monitoring activities and early outcomes for water sharing plans in the Macquarie Valley (2008–09), showing positive ecological responses despite drought impacts.

12a. 2010a Michener & Driver 2010_2009-10 E-flow report to EFRG without appendix.pdf

The main report documents strong vegetation and wildlife responses to 2009–10 environmental flows across five IMEF sites, with collaborative monitoring alongside DECC and UNSW.

12b. 2010b_Appendix 2009-10 E-flow report to EFRG.pdf

The appendix provides detailed data, site observations, and invertebrate sampling results complementing the main 2009–10 environmental flow report.

13. Macquarie Marshes - vegetation data 2001-10.xls

This Excel file compiles all IMEF vegetation monitoring data from 2001 to 2010 (excluding year 2000).

14. Vegdata Oct-2009-DECC overlap sites.xls

This dataset contains vegetation monitoring results from three additional DECC-overlapping sites for method and outcome comparison, as referenced by Driver & Michener (2009).

15. Workshop presentation _ Delivering Science to Water Committees.PDF

Presentation on how to ensure quality data for long time periods which discusses both (i) IMEF, and (ii) Other concurrent data plant survey.

16. MM-sites and transects.zip

This ZIP archive contains locational data for IMEF monitoring sites and transects used in the vegetation data cleanup file.